|
Have you ever mailed your mortgage or credit card payment with plenty
of time to spare, only to be charged a hefty late fee? You just
know your check arrived on time, but there is no way to prove it.
Well, you are not alone. Many Americans have been stung by unwarranted
late fees at one time or another. They have been left asking how,
without exercising expensive options, can a bill-payer guarantee
an on-time payment will be credited in a timely fashion, without
triggering late fees, interest and credit problems?
A
bill before Congress could hold the answer. The "Postmark Prompt
Payment Act" (H.R. 1963) requires creditors to accept a postmark
date as the date of payment. Under its provisions, a creditor can
not charge a late fee unless the envelope containing the bill payment
is postmarked after the due date.
Talk
show host Bruce Williams, syndicated on roughly 400 radio stations
in the United States, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam, proposed
the measure to Congressman John McHugh (R-NY), Chairman of the House
Subcommittee on the Postal Service. McHugh introduced H. R. 1963,
which awaits a vote in his subcommittee.
Williams
says he has received many calls during his twenty-one years in radio
from individuals who claim to have mailed payments well ahead of
time, but were assessed late fees, nonetheless. The problem, as
the talk show host describes it, is that mortgage lenders and other
creditors routinely sell their loans to companies that may be two
or three thousand miles away. The borrower cannot deliver payments
in person and typically relies on the U.S. Postal Service, which
cannot guarantee timely delivery.
In
addition, according to Williams' testimony before McHugh's subcommittee
last October, "there is a temptation for some lenders to not
pick up their mail on the last due day. Again, if the mail only
'reaches' them the following day, they are in a position to extract
late charges from their customers, charges that are not warranted."
The "Postmark Prompt Payment Act" would obviate these
problems.
H.R.
1963, as presently written, will only protect the consumer if the
payment is mailed prior to the due date, the envelope is properly
addressed, has the correct amount of postage affixed to it, and
is postmarked by the Postal Service. Metered mail will not be protected
or accepted as evidence of timely payment because of the sender's
ability to alter the postmark date.
Banking
industry groups, including the American Bankers Association, testified
in February in opposition to the bill, claiming credit issuers will
have to save a record of every envelope they receive. Williams points
out that they will only need to photocopy the small fraction which
actually are late, and only if they care to enforce a late fee policy.
He cites the IRS, which uses the postmark to determine timeliness
for millions of individual and corporate returns in its annual,
quarterly and monthly tax collections, as a successful precedent.
Expressing
the opinion that the legislation, if passed, will "level the
playing field" between borrowers and lenders, Williams delivered
to the Postal Subcommittee some 4,000 to 5,000 postcards from supporters
of the measure, which he characterized as "truly a grass roots
initiative that has worked its way into the legislative process."
|